Search

becomes eligible for health and/or dental insurance benefits pursuant to Medicare shall utilize such benefits and benefits pursuant to Medicare shall be primary and benefits provided by PLU shall be secondary. e. During the period in which a person is receiving income payments in connection with phased retirement, that person agrees to be reasonably available to PLU to respond to questions or address issues which may arise related to his/her areas of expertise. f. In the event of the death of an

, 12, 13 a-f, 14-18 ( Research If yes, answer questions 7-18 4. TYPE OF ANIMAL(S) TO BE DISPLAYED 5. LOCATION OF DISPLAY 6. DURATION OF DISPLAY (Will the animals be displayed indefinitely or for a fixed duration of time) 7. PROJECT OR LABORATORY EXERCISE(S) TITLE: 8. FUNDING STATUS (Check one) ( Funded (Underline: PHS, NSF, DOD, ED, USDA, CORP, RAC, Other - please specify.) Grant Title: ___________________________________________ Grant Number: _________________ ( Pending (Specify agency.) Grant

. TYPE OF PROTOCOL BEING SUBMITTED (Please check one. If you are proposing to modify or amend an approved protocol, please submit that protocol with changes in boldface.)  New  Three-year review  Modification/Amendment: Current Animal Protocol Number: ___________________ 3. PURPOSE OF PROJECT (Check one)  Public Display If yes, answer questions 4, 5, 6 and 12  Teaching If yes, answer questions 7, 9, 11, 12, 13 a-f, 14-18  Research If yes, answer questions 7-18 4. TYPE OF ANIMAL(S) TO BE

Phil Fawcett, MBA, PhD 2 0 6 . 6 0 5 . 3 7 4 6 | p h i l f a @ m a c . c o m | l i n k e d i n . c o m / i n / p h i l f a w c e t t CAREER SUMMARY Seven years of experience in undergraduate and graduate level instruction, combined with 20+ years of experience in new technology development. Areas of expertise include articulating a vision for future technology creation, experimentation, application, and development; leading teams through the completion of experimental technology projects

”: F: Faculty members must submit objections to proposals in writing to the Chair of EPC within 30 days from the date listed on the 30-day Notice of Curriculum Changes distributed by the EPC. Objections received within this 30-day period will suspend approval, pending resolution of the objections. In the event a dispute cannot be resolved, the EPC will make its recommendation to the faculty for action at the next regular faculty meeting. Complete copies of the proposals may be obtained from the

..................................................................................................................................... 18 Standard 2.E.2 ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Standard 2.E.3 ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Standard F - Human Resources ..................................................................................................... 22 Standard 2.F.1

Procedures Against Women in Auschwitz: An Unspoken Narrative” Who: Peggy J. Kleinplatz, Ph.D. Bio: Dr. Peggy J. Kleinplatz is Professor of Medicine, Clinical Professor of Psychology and Director of Sex and Couples Therapy Training at the University of Ottawa. She is a clinical psychologist, Board Certified in Sex Education and as a Diplomate and Supervisor of Sex Therapy. In 2015, Kleinplatz received the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counsellors and Therapists’ Professional Standard of

1 EPC 30 Day Clock Memo TO: All Faculty FROM: Educational Policies Committee SUBJECT: Notice of Curriculum Changes DATE: November 16, 2018 The 30 day review period begins November 16, 2018, and ends December 17, 2018 This notice of Curriculum Changes is published as required by the EPC Manual, part of the Faculty Handbook (8th edition). The following paragraph may be found in Section III, Part VI, Section 3, “Procedures Governing Revision of Curriculum and Degree Requirements”: F: Faculty

student that an ADRF has been filed and initiate a hearing as outlined below in “Formal Hearing Process.” The instructor has the full authority to impose penalties with respect to their class. The minimum penalty grade for dishonesty in coursework that constitutes 30% or more of a course grade shall be an “E” for the course, unless the student is enrolled “pass/fail” in the class, and then the course grade will be an “F”. Dishonesty in other required course work shall result in a minimum penalty grade

grade for dishonesty in coursework that constitutes 30% or more of a course grade shall be an “E” for the course, unless the student is enrolled “pass/fail” in the class, and then the course grade will be an “F.” Dishonesty in other required course work shall result in a minimum penalty grade of zero for that work. Occasions When an Academic Dishonesty Hearing Panel Must Be Called  When academic dishonesty includes flagrant behavior. Examples include, but are not limited to, having a substitute take